How Then Shall We Live?

I invite comment and dialogue on this topic, starting with comments from John Roshek and me.

Molly

http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=88636

Posted on APRIL 18, 2007:

THIS ISLAND EARTH
As ecological anxiety increases, the search for radical solutions begins

By Marc Maximov

What a Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire A film by Tim Bennett and Sally Erickson

After Eden: The Evolution of Human Domination by Kirkpatrick Sale Duke University Press, 200 pp.

Hope, Human and Wild: Three Stories of Living Lightly on the Earth by Bill McKibben, with a new afterword Milkweed Editions, 232 pp.

[image-1]On a freezing night last November, a crush of concerned citizens packed into the General Store Café in Pittsboro for a special screening by Chatham County documentarians Tim Bennett and Sally Erickson. What a Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire, a bleak, relentless, ecological horror film, played to a rapt house. While most Americans shrug off global warming as somebody else's problem, at this film's conclusion the viewers sat in a circle to discuss the inconvenient truths it raised. If Bennett and Erickson were recruiting fellow foot soldiers in the battle for our planet's future, we were a Coalition of the Willing. But after the show the practical obstacles to saving the planet were all too clear: We all strapped ourselves to thousands of pounds of steel, fired up noxious internal combustion engines, and drove off into the night.

Judging solely by the increased media attention, people are finally starting to confront the implications of a damaged planet (global warming was even the cover story of the March 12 issue of Sports Illustrated). On Feb. 2, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its most strongly worded warning to date, telling us that it is now a near certainty that human activity is responsible for the rise in world temperatures.

The greater American populace is ready to respond to the panel's increasingly dire warnings the same way it's responded in the past—by doing absolutely nothing—and with few exceptions, our brave leaders are also poised to spring into inaction. For those who actually care about the plight of the natural world, the film screening in Pittsboro, with its disjunction between good intentions and effective action, illustrates the staggering odds stacked against any chance of meaningful change in our society's consumption patterns.

Even if our hearts and minds are in the right place, it's our bodies, what with all the eating and schlepping around, that are taking us, environmentally speaking, to the other place (16 percent more efficiently in a Toyota Prius!). Since practical solutions at a scale that would effect real change are almost impossible to imagine, much recent environmental thought has focused on simply diagnosing the problem.

The well of anxiety tapped in What a Way to Go is finding many outlets, including Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth, and in new books. One such tome is Kirkpatrick Sale's After Eden: The Evolution of Human Domination, in which he examines the archaeological record in search of the pivotal events that sent us on our destructive path. Earlier philosophers have cited the rise of civilization as the crucial moment, and, indeed, civilization is a prime culprit, with its established pattern of turning harmless bands of wandering apes into plunderous, continent-spanning ant colonies. Surprisingly, Sale places the turning point 60,000 years earlier, while people were still hunting and gathering for their supper. In the popular imagination, "hunter-gatherer" is a catch-all term for pre-civilized peoples, whose ostensibly diverse modes of living are fundamentally alike; by contrasting late-period homo sapiens with its ancestor homo erectus, Sale argues that one hunter-gatherer is not like another.

Sale's story begins 70,000 years ago, with the eruption of Mount Toba, a huge volcano on the island of Sumatra. Notable eruptions of the last few centuries, like Mount St. Helens, Pinatubo, Krakatoa and Tambora, were all puny compared to the apocalyptic Toba event. The invention of writing was still many millennia in the future, so we can only imagine the eruption's terrifying effect on the people who lived through it, people whose anatomy and intelligence were identical to our own. Temperatures plunged and the Earth fell into a persistent volcanic winter, decimating animal and plant populations around the world. Most of our ancestors are thought to have perished. The survivors were forced to find new sources of food.

Where before people had hunted and trapped small game and scavenged for lions' leftovers, excavations from this period show dramatic improvements in weaponry and a change in the animals brought home for dinner. Capable now of bringing down fearsome big game like rhinos, elephants and the giant cape buffalo, this was the moment, according to Sale, when man first imagined himself atop the natural order, separate from and superior to his fellow creatures. Large mammals, their populations already devastated by the Toba event, had a new enemy to contend with, a superpredator. The Sixth Extinction was underway.

Sale, a historian and self-described neo-Luddite, author of a dozen books on a variety of subjects, is careful to point out in the preface that he's not a scientist. He relies on the latest findings of archaeologists and anthropologists, but his assertions are broader and more speculative. His central point is that the prehistoric "advances" celebrated in the first chapters of history textbooks were not inevitable steps on the road to greatness; rather, they were crisis responses to environmental pressures, each one a lamentable stumble in a long decline. Along with big-game hunting and agriculture, Sale disparages the taming of fire (which enabled "farming with fire," and the ability to rapidly affect ecosystems on a large scale); cave art (those lyrical images at Lascaux and Altamira were actually sinister signs of dissociative magic); even language (symbolic thinking led to the distinction between "self" and "other," which validated conquest and social inequity).

Sale's most speculative hypothesis concerns early human psychology. Prehistoric "advances" undermined the mental health of our ancestors, he argues, by alienating them from their life-giving habitat, leaving their descendents with a psyche that's "delusional, and can be maintained only by tortuous ideas of self-importance and wrathful practices of self-enhancement." Our only hope of redemption is a return to the Eden of the title, which refers to the long, peaceful reign of sapiens' immediate forebear, homo erectus. In its 1.5-million-year stretch on Earth, eight times longer than our own, erectus lived in harmony with its fellow creatures. Our survival, according to Sale, depends upon recapturing the primal erectus consciousness we still possess.

While After Eden is a thought-provoking attempt to understand the rapacity that is now so clearly characteristic of homo sapiens, too much of its argument consists simply of turning traditional notions of progress on their heads; progress becomes regress, triumph is recast as failure. It's a reductive, dogmatic primitivism: In vilifying beautiful cave paintings, and in assessing the mental health of Cro-Magnons, Sale makes his ideology do some heavy lifting. Finally, his solution to the present ecological conundrum, a return to the erectus mindset, is an appealing idea, but he admits that, even if we wanted to, we couldn't all run off and become erectus-style hunter-gatherers. It's hard to visualize practical next steps to take to reclaim our erectus mentality.

Like After Eden, What a Way to Go! builds its argument from a survey of experts. Alternately personal and political, Bennett intersperses his family's home movies, campy stock footage and interviews with friends and family with comments from an assortment of authors, scientists, visionaries and cultural critics he and Erickson met when they circled the country by train in the fall of 2005.

Their choice of conveyance was apt, as the film's most memorable image is an extended metaphor that likens our civilization, on its inexorable, self-destructive hurtle, to a runaway train. We're riding to our doom on the rails of peak oil, climate change, mass extinction and population overshoot. The engine is the collection of cultural myths that perpetuate a way of life that's profoundly out of balance. So far the ride has been smooth enough to lull most of the passengers to sleep. It's the dark tunnel ahead that has the filmmakers worried.

Bennett and Erickson certainly did their research. No fewer than 20 experts populate the film, including anarcho-primitivist authors Daniel Quinn (Ishmael) and Derrick Jensen, local environmental scientists like Duke's William Schlesinger and Stuart Pimm and UNC-Chapel Hill's Douglas Crawford-Brown, and other eco-luminaries like Richard Heinberg, Jerry Mander, Richard Manning, Chellis Glendinning and Thomas Berry. With so many experts speaking on so many subjects, the filmmakers decided to organize the film with title pages of topics and subtopics, which gives it the flavor of a PowerPoint presentation. Those already up on their science and well-versed in the tenets of deep ecology won't find much they haven't heard before; but for the average concerned citizen, it's a broad and comprehensive summary.

Sustaining a single, unvarying note of earnest despair for most of its two-hour running time, the compounded effect of all the bad news begins to feel numbing. But it also builds a powerful momentum as one expert after another distills a great many vital and disturbing issues to their essence. Perhaps, in light of the monumental challenges we face, our first reaction should be despair. As Bennett solemnly intones, "I have read many books about the world situation, and I have noticed a curious thing: the happy chapter.... I don't like happy chapters. They've lulled me back to sleep. They suggest that somebody, somewhere, somehow, is handling it. I can just go on with my life."

For those willing to do the hard work of changing deep-seated cultural habits, there's a crying need for the far-sighted to show the way. One such is Bill McKibben, author of the 1995 book Hope, Human and Wild: Three Stories of Living Lightly on the Earth. (On Wednesday, April 18, McKibben will appear at Quail Ridge Books in Raleigh. See Calendar Spotlight on page 34.) In that book, which has just been reissued with a new afterword, McKibben describes three examples of what the cover promises: "True stories of living lightly on the Earth."

McKibben's first true story is of his adopted home, the Adirondacks of upstate New York, and the remarkable resurgence of forests and wildlife in the Eastern United States. The area was almost entirely cleared for farmland in the early centuries of American settlement, but now, with the farmers long gone westward, the woodlands are returning, at a rate of a million acres a decade (an area larger than Rhode Island) in New York State alone. McKibben's two other real-life cases are about a pair of peculiar Third-World locales: the Brazilian city of Curitiba and the Indian province of Kerala.

In Curitiba, a series of chance events in the early 1970s resulted in the appointment of 33-year-old Jaime Lerner as mayor. Lerner is an architect and planner whose rare combination of idealism and pragmatism made him one of the most effective and visionary mayors in the world. Under his watch, though Curitiba's population soared like those of Brazil's other large cities, newcomers were better integrated than in the endless, filthy slums of Sao Paulo or Rio de Janeiro, and the city remained pleasant and livable. The transportation system is one reason for this, and it's the city's most notable success. With an efficient network of dedicated express lanes for buses, some of which carry up to 300 passengers, the Curitiban system is essentially an above-ground subway, at one-hundredth the cost; as a result, citizens of Curitiba use significantly less fuel than the average Brazilian, even though they're more likely to own cars.

Kerala is another example of people doing more with less. Its per capita income is one-seventieth that of the United States, typical for India; yet its life expectancy, literacy levels and low birth rates are equivalent to America's, far better than the rest of the nation. The people are well-educated and healthy, and they take an active part in the political life of the state. While in many respects Kerala's impressive statistics are an aberration in the Third World, McKibben is quick to point out that Kerala, like Curitiba, is no utopia: Unemployment is high and the economy is stagnant. What it is, most importantly for Americans, is a counterargument to the pervasive idea that a high level of consumption is necessary for a high quality of life.

In the new afterword to the 2007 edition of Hope, McKibben relates continued positive developments in Curitiba and Kerala (the news from the Adirondacks is mixed); even more promising, some of their innovations have spread to other parts of the developing world. Ideally, we in America could learn from their examples as well. "The lesson," he writes, "is that some of our fears about simpler living are unjustified. It is not a choice between suburban America and dying at thirty-five, between Wal-Mart and hunger.... The average American income is seventy times the average Keralite one—there is some latitude for change."

The question of whether we humans have damaged our habitat has been definitively settled. Now the question is whether we have the will to change. Can we eat more sustainably and locally? Can we plan our cities on a human scale? Can we do without so much stuff? For the first time in human history, we have proof that the local insults we've perpetrated on the natural world have accrued to a global ledger, with unknown consequences for the planet and every living thing on it. Each generation likes to think it occupies a special place in history. The 6.5 billion souls currently drawing breath may have the strongest claim yet.

For information on What a Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire, visit www.whatawaytogomovie.com.

Comments

Stefan's picture

Peacebuilding and Relocalization

Hi Molly,

I am the founder and outreach coordinator for The Interfaith Peacebuilding and Community Revitalization (IPCR) Initiative.

In my visits to relocalize.net, I did see references to your posts mentioned below, but I was waiting to respond until a new website associated with The IPCR Initiative was online. It is now online (at www.ipcri.net).

I have excerpted two passages from posts of yours to preface my commentary. Here are the quotes from your posts:

From “How Then Shall We Live?”

“For those willing to do the hard work of changing deep-seated cultural habits, there's a crying need for the far-sighted to show the way.”

From “Spiritual Challenges of Global Climate Change and Peak Oil”

“I believe that the changes that lie ahead will call upon each of us to serve one another and our communities in ways we may never have thought possible. I am convinced that such service will prove to be the most fulfilling experience many of us will ever have had in our lives.”

Here is my commentary on those quotes:

On the subject of the “crying need for the far-sighted to show the way”, I would like to refer to “Challenge #10” from The IPCR Initiative’s list of the “Ten Most Difficult Challenges of Our Times”. (see the document “An Assessment of the Most Difficult Challenges of Our Times”—or Appendix 1 of the essay “Peacebuilding in its Most Compassionate Form”)

Challenge #10—“Sorting out what are real challenges and what are sound and practical solutions is becoming more and more difficult, as there is now, in many parts of the world, a multitude of ideas of all kinds coming to the fore in personal, family, community, and cultural life—all at the same time.”

As one of the ways to help this sorting out process, The IPCR Initiative is advocating for “Community Good News Networks”. “Community Good News Networks”—is a name for participation by local community residents in an ongoing process of actively discovering, sharing, encouraging, and creating good news, for the purpose of “… bringing to the fore what is often hidden: how many good people there are, how may ways there are to do good, and how much happiness comes to those who extend help as well as to those who receive it.” If any community of people seriously undertook a systematic effort at creating such a local resource, they would find, as others have who have looked, that “Even now, as you are reading this, truly inspiring contributions of genuine goodwill are being generated in a variety of ways—and in a variety of circumstances— by countless numbers of people in communities around the world.”

There is considerable evidence of these many contributions supplied in the third section of the essay “Peacebuilding in its Most Compassionate Form” (a section titled “We Have The Resources To Overcome The Challenges Of Our Times”). Included in that evidence is a list of “105 Related Fields of Activity”—a list which, if researched, would reveal that there are many people who are actively involved in translating the potential energy now accessible to us into positive and constructive initiatives… many people who are already on the pathways to resolving many of the challenges of our times.

The difficulty seems to be Challenge #10 mentioned above: It is really very difficult to sort out what is relevant and what is not when there is so much to sort through, even for people who have enough background experience to know what to look for.

It is in this sense that there are many important initiatives which are critical to overcoming the challenges of our times, but which are not quite “coming through the mist as much as they should be.” (quote from an Albert Bates interview) The IPCR Initiative can be very helpful in exactly these kinds of circumstances, as it encourages and facilitates a “constellation” of initiatives by which the best (in the view of the participants using these processes) associated with individual spiritual formation, interfaith peacebuilding, community revitalization, ecological sustainability, etc. can bubble up to the surface, be recognized as priorities, and therefore be brought forward as appropriate recipients of peoples’ time, energy, and money. Many people can realize the wisdom of deliberately focusing the way they spend their time, energy, and money so that their actions have positive repercussions on the fields of activity described by the IPCR Mission Statement goals, and on other related fields of activity (see “105 related fields of activity”). As the ancient Chinese proverb says: “Many hands make much work light.”

Among the many “constellation” of initiatives encouraged by The IPCR Initiative are initiatives associated with the practical application of Eight Concepts: “Community Good News Networks,” “Community Faith Mentoring Networks,” “Spiritual Friendships,” “Questionnaires That Help Build Caring Communities,” “Community Visioning Initiatives for Peace,” “Spiritually Responsible Investing,” “Ecological Sustainability,” and “IPCR Journal/Newsletters”.

As you can see, there is a spiritual element which is emphasized in these concepts. This is because—as Challenges #1,2, and 3 of the IPCR’s list of the ten most difficult challenges of our times will illustrate, I believe that collectively we are experiencing a serious disconnect associated with “moral compasses”. The serious disconnect is that while there are many people who can identify many of the challenges of our times, there seems to be very few who connect such challenges to a widespread disassociation with the treasured wisdom of religious, spiritual, and moral traditions.

As an example, consider this short list, which I believe can suffice as representative of “treasured wisdom”:

1) place a high priority on the development of truth, virtue, love, and peace—and live disciplined lives for the purpose of adhering to truth, cultivating virtue and love, and maintaining the pathways to enduring peace
2) sacrifice personal desires for the greater good of the whole
3) find contentment and quality of life while consuming less material goods and ecological services
4) prefer peacebuilding which supports and actualizes mutually beneficial understandings, forgiveness, and reconciliation—and which abstains from violent conflict resolution—as a way
of bringing cycles of violence to an end
5) use resources carefully, so that there is surplus available for emergency assistance
6) support community life and cultural traditions which ‘… bring to the fore what is often hidden: how many good people there are, how many ways there are to do good, and how much happiness comes to those who extend help, as well as to those who receive it.’”

The point here is that if we gain enough clarity on the idea that we are not cultivating this kind of treasured wisdom to the degree that we need to be, we can then increase the intensity of our focus on just such cultivation. The essay “Peacebuilding in its Most Compassionate Form” does give some good detail on how we could gain more clarity on this deficiency, and also provides much detail on how we could increase the intensity of our focus on just such cultivation. And it is just such cultivation which would provide the experiences which I imagine to be related to the second passage of yours that I quoted:

“I believe that the changes that lie ahead will call upon each of us to serve one another and our communities in ways we may never have thought possible. I am convinced that such service will prove to be the most fulfilling experience many of us will ever have had in our lives.”

The concluding comments of the essay “Peacebuilding in its Most Compassionate Form” are as follows:

One of the most persistent ironies in life is that with so many opportunities to provide real assistance to fellow human beings—and with the potential for such assistance to result in happiness “to those who extend help as well as to those who receive it”—there are still many, many people in this world who cannot find a “way to earn a living” providing such assistance. The IPCR Initiative can help to remedy such an unfortunate irony by helping to create “caring communities”, which are defined here as follows:

“Caring communities” are communities with residents who are aware of the
depth and range of the challenges of our times, and therefore do their best
to take actions which will have positive repercussions on the fields of
activity described by the IPCR Mission Statement goals (see p. 6-7),
and on other related fields of activity (see p. 3).

The most advanced societies are the ones which are successful at integrating spiritual wisdom into the everyday circumstances of community life.

Our particular moment in time on this Planet Earth could be the best of times.

Peacebuilding in its most compassionate form is not a competitive field of activity. Viewed in this light, the most valuable forms of peacebuilding will nurture, support, and sustain the development of an infinite variety of other forms of peacebuilding, community revitalization, and ecologically sustainability initiatives. The IPCR Initiative is an effort to nurture, support, and sustain peacebuilding in its most compassionate form.

I invite you, and other people who might read this post, to visit the website of The IPCR Initiative at www.ipcri.net.

We have the resources necessary to overcome the challenges of our times.

Our particular moment in time on this Planet Earth could be the best of times.

Kind Regards,

Stefan Pasti
The IPCR Initiative

Molly Brown's picture

How Then Shall We Live?

Comment from jerome444@hotmail.com:

This article was useful in jogging my awareness by asking myself why I would present yet another video of "The Day After" to the same choir again and again, when I am minimally implementing part of the solution in my personal and community life. What gives with my wanting to "educate "them"? Am I really teaching despair and hopelessness by the way I'm living, not my words? You've heard my doubts many times. If some high school teen or group of teens could see "What a Way to Go..." perhaps they might be galvanized to take their concerns, at least, to their peer group. I'm not a Martin Luther King or Ghandi, fully walking their talk, equivalent to my peer group.
The best action I did last year was step back from my commun. garden facilitator role making space for others to step forward or not. Would others step forward if you and I totally left our facilitator roles with APPLE and took a chance that it possibly could become grounded in a new direction? I didn't know whether any one would step forward with the c.g.
Do you know any teacher in the schools that could introduce us to teens that would see the video?

Molly Brown's picture

Dialogue

You know what occurs to me? A "formal" dialogue (a la Bohm) among a small group of us, exploring just these questions you raise. I am already embarked on writing an essay about living with integrity in these times, and would love to hear how others are grappling with these issues. No easy answers, and that's what everyone wants. "If you bring me bad news, follow it with the solution!" And there is no "solution," only directions we can explore, one baby step at a time.

Your comments provide a good starting place. I will post the article and your comment on the APPLE web site under Community Blog. Let's hope other APPLE-ites will join in.

Molly Brown
www.mollyyoungbrown.com

Larry Menkes's picture

No easy answers; Socratic dialog, depression, muddling on

Molly,

The Delaware Valley Sustainability list-serve has explored the topic of One Sustainable Day (dvs@actionpa.org) without arriving at definative answers. It was covered by Kevin Hansen (PierreTerre.com). What seemed to emerge is that the transition will be a process and evolve over time. What a sustainable day looks like today will be different from that of tomorrow, but the common denominator will always be doing the best with what you've got in each moment. I have found that, in a way, it's an exercise in living consciously, mindfully, and hopefully, joyously.

What I'd like to dialog is a vision of transition from the here and now to a sustainable world. Yes, David Bohm described it best, but it's an ancient and very spiritual exercise. I would add the caveat that this vision must be expressed in positive terms.

I sense that you have an organic approach to "solution". The collective exploration seems to be a linear one that leads to whatever the collective adaptation chooses. It's like travelling up the trunk of a very leafy tree (so leafy you can't see more than a little way up at any time in the early stages) and choosing a promising branch, again and again.

Along the way, Elisabeth Kubler-Ross' treatise on the Five Stages of (reactions on) Receiving Catastrophic News comes into play and it's as easy to get angry and depressed as it is to resort to bargaining (if I change all my light bulbs to CFL's, join a CSA, and buy a Prius, will I have done enough?).

I love the idea of creating a vision via dialog. If you ever form a group to do that let me know. The challange is to find someone to monitor the process to insure that the rules are respected.

Larry Menkes, ECLA PA
215.328.9128 home
267.992.8020 cell
"You must be the change you want to see in the world."
(m. gandhi)

Shelby Tay's picture

Re: screenings in classrooms

Hi Molly,
Thanks for posting! Hopefully some more discussion will be generated.
More and more teachers are starting to screen films like 'What A Way to Go" in their classes. Many have also shown students the Oil Age Poster (http://www.relocalize.net/oilposter) and led discussions around our dependency on oil.

cheers,
shelby

Relocalization Network Coord.