From: Christopher Flavin: WorldWatch President
If the world succeeds in avoiding ecological collapse, historians may one day look back on 2006 as the “tipping-point” moment.
Around the globe, the past year has produced a remarkable series of indicators that human societies are waking up to the precarious state of our world. If current trends are not reversed—and soon—we will hand the next generation not only a natural resource base on the verge of collapse, but a global economy on the edge of failure.
Even though 2006 was marked by its share of acute crises, led by the conflicts in Iraq and Darfur, the less acute but more profound crisis of global climate disruption reached the top rungs of public attention for the first time. Scientists warn we may soon cross a threshold of no return as dying forests and warming tundra release additional carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, enabling climate change to feed on itself. In fact, some believe it could already be too late.
This urgency is being reflected in public opinion. In tallying the results of 2006 elections and opinion polls in several countries, the news service Reuters adapted an old James Carville phrase, “It’s the environment, stupid.” In Europe, which has long eclipsed the United States in such matters, even conservative parties have taken up the environmental banner. And in the pivotal U.S. mid-term elections, analysts were surprised to find that global warming played a role in many races, often at the expense of incumbents who had ignored the problem. As a result, climate policy will be high on the agendas of both Democratic and Republican legislators in 2007.
The awakening of the United States from years of fitful hibernation is my nomination for the most momentous environmental development of the year. Without the leadership of the world’s leading superpower—and biggest polluter—it is impossible to mobilize the global consensus needed to tackle this daunting problem, or to galvanize the second and third most important countries, China and India.
The most intriguing part of the U.S. story involves my home state of California, which in September adopted landmark legislation to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Notably, venture capitalists and Silicon Valley entrepreneurs played a key role in pushing the new climate bill through. Today, renewable energy technologies like solar power and biofuels are growing at nearly 20 times the rate of fossil fuels, and major institutions and investors like Wal-Mart, DuPont, and Goldman Sachs are channeling billions of dollars in their direction.
In the more than three decades that Worldwatch has tracked global environmental trends, there has never been a year like the one now coming to a close. We have entered a period of rapid, non-linear change, not only in our planet’s ecosystems, but in the worlds of business and politics as well. The question now is whether humanity will continue to mobilize—before it’s too late. 2007 will provide a test of whether this incredible new momentum can be maintained.
December 29th, 2006
"It May Not Be Too Late"? Hey! NOW you're talkin' my language!!!
"It May Not Be Too Late"? Hey! NOW you're talkin' my language!!!
December 29th, 2006
We can make a difference
If we are going to prevent massive disaster then now is the time that we need to work together to do so. Each one of us can make a difference in our own communities. We have the tools to build sustainable communities what we lack is the political and social will to do so.
www.bobewing.org
January 8th, 2007
We can make a difference
I agree with you but I've seen some cracks in thay barrier lately. It may be that things are beginning to shift toward action.
What surprises me is the relatively small number of activists who actually practice what they preach. I've found that example isn't only the best teacher, it's the only teacher.
I'm trying to fertilize a grassroots movement toward sustainability. If all the activists were to become carbon-neutral, and then get off the "grid" we might achieve the critical mass we need to spark that evolution.
January 6th, 2007
Investment in Energy-saving Technologies
How do I find these investors? I have had nothing but bad luck in finding someone who genuinely wants to support such new technologies.
January 8th, 2007
Investment in Energy-saving Technologies.
How to find these investors? It would be difficult to reply because it's unclear which new technologies you are referring to. I'm also confused a bit because I'm unsure how this relates to the Worldwatch posting and I just reread it.
Generally speaking, then, it's my impression that "these investors" prefer to put their money into "things" they know about, so they seem to be "technology specific" and sometimes, geographic location specific. And, all other things being equal, they usually seem most interested in turning a profit, so they'll need to see how you'll help them with that.
I am aware of investors that are interested in putting seven figures into high-performance mixed use developments. Yet a friend in Lancaster is having difficulty finding help for moving out of the prototype stage for a novel high performance heat pump. He's trying other means to attract (and that seems to be a key) investors. I'll encourage a few to reply to you so you can compare notes.
February 3rd, 2007
It May Not Be Too Late, Unless It Already Is
The key question really is, "too late for what?"
The February 2, 2007 IPCC report makes it very clear that the changes already in the works will continue. It is already too late hold greenhouse gas emissions to the level of today. It's too late to go backwards from here because what's already in the atmosphere will persist for up to a century.
The IPCC's Fourth Assesment Report has a crucial caveat. When it pronounces an additional 8 inches of sea level rise on top of their 23" maximum estimate it goes like this: "..if recent surprising melting of polar ice sheets continues". (Ref.: AP's Seth Borenstein.)
The report reiterates that polar regions, specifically Antarctica, are the "wild cards" of global climate change, an echo from a vintage '80's publication from Columbia's Lamont Dougherty Geophysical Observatory. These polar "cards" are so wild, and the process of "phase change" so unpredictable that more surprising melting can occur.
If it does it's anybody's guess when and where this global geological process will come back into a semblance of equilibrium. In the meantime, it seems appropriate to pull out all the stops in making the known required changes. Until we know for sure, anything less would be a crime against the planet; a class beyond "crimes against humanity".
Larry Menkes
"Becoming the change I want to see in the world."