... So far the Bali deal is worse than Kyoto

View
Edit

Author, Affiliation, Date:

Title: *

Body:

The Guardian - <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2228527,00.html">&quot;We&#39;ve been suckered again by the US. So far the Bali deal is worse than Kyoto&quot;</a> 
&quot;America will keep on wrecking climate talks as long as those with vested interests in oil and gas fund its political system&quot; 

 
Exerpts -


&quot;In 1997 and in 2007 [the US] got the best of both worlds: it wrecked the treaty and was praised for saving it.&quot;


&quot;There are still two years to go, but so far the new agreement is even worse than the Kyoto protocol. It contains no targets and no dates. A new set of guidelines also agreed at Bali extend and strengthen the worst of Gore&#39;s trading scams, the clean development mechanism.&quot; &quot;Dupes are cheering and waving their hats as the train leaves the station at last, having failed to notice that it is travelling in the wrong direction.&quot;


&quot;So why, regardless of the character of its leaders, does the US act this way? Because, like several other modern democracies, it is subject to two great corrupting forces. I have written before about the role of the corporate media - particularly in the US - in downplaying the threat of climate change and demonising anyone who tries to address it. I won&#39;t bore you with it again, except to remark that at 3pm eastern standard time on Saturday, there were 20 news items on the front page of the Fox News website. The climate deal came 20th, after &quot;Bikini-wearing stewardesses sell calendar for charity&quot; and &#39;Florida store sells &#39;Santa Hates You&#39; T-shirt&#39;.


Let us consider instead the other great source of corruption: campaign finance. The Senate rejects effective action on climate change because its members are bought and bound by the companies that stand to lose. When you study the tables showing who gives what to whom, you are struck by two things.


One is the quantity. Since 1990, the energy and natural resources sector - mostly coal, oil, gas, logging and agribusiness - has given $418m to federal politicians in the US. Transport companies have given $355m. The other is the width: the undiscriminating nature of this munificence. The big polluters favour the Republicans, but most of them also fund Democrats. During the 2000 presidential campaign, oil and gas companies lavished money on Bush, but they also gave Gore $142,000, while transport companies gave him $347,000. The whole US political system is in hock to people who put their profits ahead of the biosphere.


So don&#39;t believe all this nonsense about waiting for the next president to sort it out. This is a much bigger problem than George Bush. Yes, he is viscerally opposed to tackling climate change. But viscera don&#39;t have much to do with it. Until the American people confront their political funding system, their politicians will keep speaking from the pocket, not the gut. &quot;


&nbsp;

Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Allowed HTML tags: <a> <strike> <ul> <ol> <li> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <dl> <dt> <dd> <hr>

More information about formatting options

Group menu

... So far the Bali deal is worse than Kyoto

Sustainable Burlington

Want to join this group?

User login

Who's online