Call for submissions on housing

Yesterday Lorraine Pyefinch was kind enough to forward to me this call for submissions for the Wide Bay Burnett Ministerial Regional Community Forum. This is an opportunity for SustainaBundy to provide feedback regarding sustainable housing for the Wide Bay area, to talk about smaller homes, passive solar and energy efficient design considerations, appropriate density with neighbourhood-wide instead of single home amenities, and anything else we deem important. Closing date for submissions is the 22nd of February, and I would really like to see a joint submission from key SustainaBundy members. Would anyone like to participate in this with me? Beth?

The call for comment follows.

Andi
_____________________

We welcome your comments

Housing…. A mix for our future

Identified as a significant Blueprint for the Bush priority at the Annual Blueprint for the Bush Ministerial Community Forum held in Mareeba in October 2007, the Wide Bay Burnett Ministerial Regional Community forum members are researching the topic of “Getting the Housing Mix right for our Future”.

The need to get our housing mix right has been identified though extensive community consultation including forum member feedback, the Wide Bay Burnett Regional Plan, the Rural Futures Strategy, numerous Local Government Social Plans and the Wide Bay Burnett Regional Housing Board.

Forum Members would like to hear your thoughts and ideas around opportunities to ensure that our region has as appropriate mix and access to housing which matches their needs.

“Developing innovative opportunities to match our region’s housing mix to our lifestyle and demographics”

What does this mean to you?

This statement will mean different things to many different people for some it will mean having housing where regular people can afford to pay their rent, or even better their mortgage; for others it may mean developing high quality (top of the market) housing that helps to attract and support highly skilled workers (such as doctors, teachers etc) to the region.

It may mean encouraging greater diversity in the development of ecologically sustainable housing to suite both our coastal and rural climates or being proactive as a region in the design and development of climate smart living…. As a way of life.

For some it may mean ensuring that we have innovative and appropriate housing to support our aging population, such as retirement villages and nursing homes, for others it’s about being given a break (or a least not being discriminated against) when trying to move out of home for the first time.

Others may see it as a limited availability of land or flexibility in Town Planning Schemes that encourage developers to build new properties. It may be about housing density, is the quarter acre block still appropriate for our communities?, do we need more units or townhouses? A recent report identified that by 2026 over 58% of households in the Wide Bay Burnett will comprise of 1.7 people and yet the average new home is 4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms and 2 living areas.

For some it may simply be having a place (any where) to live other than on the streets or in a car with the pressure to provide social and crisis housing in our cities growing all the time.

But for most of us thinking about what an innovative, appropriate, affordable housing mix for our region means, is simply overwhelming. Forum members invite you to share your experiences, knowledge and ideas for solutions to the question of:

Housing – a mix for our future

How can we get the region’s housing mix right to match our lifestyle and demographics? in particular forum members would like to hear your thoughts on:

* Housing Affordability…. What does this mean to you?
* What do you see as the opportunities for “Climate Smart Living”? How can we design our housing communities to ensure a sustainable future for our region in response to mitigating climate change?
* What could a model for innovative and appropriate housing for our region look like?
* How can we get the balance between rural and urban areas right?
* What impact does appropriate housing have on the ability to attract and retain skilled workers to our region? And how can we provide this?
* How can we ensure that we have the appropriate housing for our demographics including housing for both our young people and aged residents?
* What unique opportunities do you see for our region to be proactive in the design of innovative sustainable provision of housing for our region?
* What opportunities do we have to develop our communities into “living places” where we can have sustainable mix of agriculture, industry and lifestyle within our communities?

Community feedback will form the basis of a proposal that forum members will present to the State Government at the next Ministerial Regional Community Forum, scheduled to take place Monday, 7 April 2008 with venue and time yet to be determined.

You are invited to submit written comments; and/or attend a public workshop

Comments
Closing date for comments: Friday, 22 February 2008
Email: Helen.hughes@communities.qld.gov.au
Postal Address: PO Box 1939, BUNDABERG 4670
Fax: 4151 9750

dino's picture

Re: Call for submissions on housing

One thing I have really picked up on is that houses are getting bigger
... and boring looking. But the population data doesn't support the need
for larger houses. I can only conclude that part of the embiggening is
due to people wanting to be inside more with their air con. The weather
here is great. Why not a smaller house and larger outdoor
dining/entertaining areas.

Properly designing houses to take advantage of the climate we have here
doesn't appear to be the in thing. Black roofs? Who thought that was a
good idea? With a big honking air conditioner just to reduce the
temperature down to what it would have been with a lighter coloured roof.

Suburbs need designing to allow houses to be situated on the blocks for
passive solar design - taking advantage of the lower sun in winter to
warm the house and blocking the Summer sun from entry into the house.
Big glass windows on the Western wall of a house heats up the house in
Summer substantially.

There are houses I have seen around town with solar hot water systems
facing East or even South-ish so as they don't detract from the view
from the street.

Just a few thoughts to start.

Dean

ahazelwood's picture

re: call for submissions on housing

A reminder, today is the closing date for comments on "housing... a mix for our future." More information available here.

Following is our submission:

We are very lucky in the Wide Bay Burnett to have all this space to spread out. Cheap petrol has allowed us to drive anywhere we need to go, to choose to live in a quiet subdivision twenty or more minutes from work. The number of cars on the roads have increased, and for some people that twenty minute drive has turned in to twenty five or more as they find themselves battling traffic congestion when five years ago there was none. Will they still be enjoying their quiet subdivision in another 5 years? The last few years has seen a boom in the region, and the general consensus seems to be to continue growing.
With the influx of people to the region, building new subdivisions is the only way to accommodate so many, but are housing developers paying attention to the world around us and what future housing needs will be? We are living in times of climate instability and energy and fuel price escalation. These factors need to be considered when we look at building for the future needs of our region.
We need to think differently. We need to build for the people that make up the community, not just their cars. Many new developments have no option to walk or bike to the supermarket, medical centre or school without having to share the road with sugar cane trucks. How close is the fire, police and hospital? New development needs to take into account the whole community, and the links between communities.
A good mix of businesses and housing - apartment blocks, duplexes and family homes - allows greater density of population which will mean better opportunities for residents and local businesses as well as more intelligent transport infrastructure. This will support a good mix of families, professionals, students and seniors and make a strong, vibrant and sustainable community.
Proximity to green space - parks, gardens, sports fields - is essential for people to enjoy living in higher density housing. Families like having a back yard so their children can play cricket or footy and their dogs can run and play. But if a community park with maintained facilities is within a short walk, then a yard isn't as necessary. However, in any given suburb a mix of houses and with large yards and small allows people to make that choice when buying.
Luckily, affordability for this growing population does not have to be a problem. Smaller homes are cheaper to build and easier to own, furnish and clean. The Bundaberg region can easily increase the affordability of new homes, not through government grants or easy interest payment schemes but by making smaller homes a part of the development plan!
Developments today capitalise on cheap energy resources that will not remain cheap. Entire subdivisions of quarter acre blocks, each with an underutilised, emerald green lawn that requires heaps of precious energy and water to maintain; each with a large house, poorly designed for the prevailing weather, need to become a thing of the past - for both affordability and sustainability. Who thought a black metal roof and no verandah was a smart idea? An air conditioner sales man perhaps?
Passive solar housing design is making a come back as architects realise that large north-facing windows are great for light and views, but if the summer sun enters it then the home becomes an oven. Passive solar design incorporates design elements - placement of windows, size of eaves, even landscaping of gardens near the house - to minimise the cost of indoor heating and cooling. What we are seeing now is only one or two homes in a development with good passive solar design principles. It would be better if the entire subdivision was designed to allow maximum passive solar design for every block. This isn't new. The Romans were aware of this, and even large sections of Pompeii had passive solar design - for everyone, from the peasants to the VIPs - to ensure rooms were adequately heated by the sun in winter.
The majority of older homes and the a good portion of new homes in this region are under insulated - old Queenslanders especially. Insulation is seen as expensive, and adding a air conditioner is the cheap option. Again we are seeing a short term mindset. Are the benefits of insulation being under represented when people are looking to improve their current home or buy a new one?
Natural building materials, compressed straw panels, and other low embodied energy choices should become standard available options when designing a new house in the region. Solar Hot Water Systems should be standard. And their location on the roof should be part of initial design. The energy savings provided by a solar hot water system for a family of four would very nearly be enough to power another entire house!
Photovoltaic Solar Panels could be a check box to be included in the build of a new house. With present government rebates and energy company incentives, it would be a very low included cost as opposed to an expensive add-on.
With low air pollution compared to the bigger cities, our region should be doing whatever it can to promote the integration of rainwater tanks for gardens and laundry facilities. The less water that needs to be treated for human consumption the better, as every litre needs to be pumped and costs the council home owners rates.
To summarise, the Wide Bay Burnett has an exciting opportunity to enact systemic change for the long term benefit of its residents. If we do not have the political will to make these changes now, then the residents will continue to pay for poorly designed communities for decades.

Regards,

Dean & Andi Hazelwood
SustainaBundy Inc.

davidg's picture

Re: call for submissions on housing

Hello Dean and Andi,
Where do you start? Dean is quite correct, the average family has 1.5 kids as opposed to 3 or 4 on average only twenty five years ago. Break throughs in modern medicine are a contributing factor to this. The infant mortality rate dictated that you had seven and four lived to adult hood. This is another large subject on its own.

The average house should ( in my opinion) be a 3 bedroom double brick home with a 12 foot ceiling at least for the Bundaberg climate. It should have a sloped northerly facing roof for a solar hot water system and solar panels for partial to independant power supply. It should have water tanks with carrying capacity of at least 25,000 litres, and a third tank either above or below ground for grey water storage to use for watering with a sewerage overflow. Windows on the Northern facing side of the house should be small and on the east and west side should be the large windows and sliding doors. It goes to say that utility rooms should be on the Northern side of the house and living/bedrooms on the South. Garages really should be redundant and carports which can be multi purpose should be placed on the east side of the house. Black roofs? Maybe where your solar hot water system is as black is the most energy(heat) absorbing colour, whereas white is the least absorbent. All children need to have a yard, even if its small, ( we always remember things as being a lot bigger than they actually were as children) Plus, you need room for your Permaculture garden! Large public areas are great, but all humans sometimes need some private time and a garden is good medicine from that aspect.

Now, here's the kicker, up until recently most Councils in NSW and Queensland had actually outlawed water tanks. Why? as incredulous as it sounds, they made money selling a commodity they obviously had no supply control over! ( water )If you were to enforce such a monopoly and were unable to guarantee supply, the Government through the ACCC would have a field day with you. As a matter of course though the Government isn't silly, they know the details of everyone who bought tanks for future 'levying' purposes via the generous rebate scheme. Not stupid are they, they will recoup their outlay by charging an annual tank inspection fee. ( it was proposed in Northern New South Wales a couple of years ago before the drought hit hard and they scrapped it in the rush to legalise tanks and get everyone to purchase. Same with the solar panels, who supplies the energy, now deregulated and privatised to some extent but still under Government scrutiny. Who benefits from everyone getting solar panels besides BP? I'm sure Energex would love to be sending all their customers cheques instead of getting them? Same for grey water tanks, great idea, why didn't anyone think of them sooner - they did, it just doesn't suit the purveyors of water!

Do I sound like I am a bit sceptical? I am. You will be asked for a submission and thats wonderful, get the community involved, we have wonderful plans for the future, bright ideas. But the powers that be have plans as well, and the groups that influence them have their own idea's as to what makes a sustainable future. So take out the water tanks, because, well its started raining and the water isn't legally defined as 'potable' anyway, there is the public risk to think about. ( how very thoughtful of them) And as for solar panels, well they are expensive, and the raw materials to make them are getting scarce! which means the powers that be are doing a good thing for the environment arent they? Grey water, forget it, too much risk and liability to the public. Double brick? Too costly, Northerly facing? Could be a terrible burden on the town planners to draft up and could cost the developers an enormous amount in lost real estate in the sensible carving up of the estate.

Besides, isn't it an Australians god given right to live in a Mcmansion without an environmental care in the world? After all Africans living in mud huts are another world away.

Dean and andi, I'm afraid that this environmenatl revolution is going to to be fought and won, in the minds and homes of the population of this country, like all successful revolutions, at the Grass Roots level, not by the outwardly altruistic but ulitimately money driven bureaucracy. They just want a rubber stamp from groups like yours, so later on they can point the finger and say, "but you had a say in it!"

By all means putting in a submission is absolutely the right thing to do, complacency is a killer. Hope for the best, plan for the worst. (and I didn't even start on urban design and bike ways! )

Cheers. David.